October 27, 2005

For Tire Makers, An Expensive Battle At the Racetrack

Very Excellent article and quite timely too. Been wondering the cost structure of Bridgestone and Michelin when Goodyear has withdrawn from Formula 1 citing increasing costs.

Michelin, Bridgestone Promote
Products at Formula One;
Benefits Are Hard to Gauge
Money Spent Is 'Staggering'
By JO WRIGHTON and JATHON SAPSFORD
Staff Reporters of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
October 27, 2005; Page A1


For the past five years, French tire maker Michelin SCA and Japan's Bridgestone Corp. have battled one another for the right to brag they produce the world's fastest Formula One racing tires.

At Michelin's research center, one of the largest privately owned chemistry laboratories in Europe, the world's No. 1 tire maker tinkers obsessively with a secret formula for the 150 types of rubbers, oils, resins and other materials that go into its racing tires. At its research center in Tokyo, No. 2 Bridgestone labors to perfect its own recipe.

Both efforts are cloaked in secrecy. The two tire makers send security guards to each Grand Prix racing event to watch over their tires day and night. After each race, the worn tires are shredded. Says Robert Bell, technical director of the Renault racing team: "It's a very black art."


Both companies say Formula One helps them sell more regular tires. But from a marketing standpoint, it is unclear whether either company is winning anything. Michelin spends about $70 million a year on Formula One, Bridgestone more than $100 million, people familiar with the numbers say. Neither company can point to hard evidence of an impact on sales and profits.


Companies have used big-time sporting events to pitch products for decades, and it has always proved difficult to pinpoint the benefits. Equipping a Formula One team clearly raises brand awareness, tire companies say, but it is less clear whether it directly boosts sales. A look inside the unusual duel between Michelin and Bridgestone during the 2005 Grand Prix season underscores that point, and also reveals that such marketing tactics hold serious downside risk.

In June, for example, blowouts of Michelin tires led seven teams to withdraw from the U.S. Grand Prix, infuriating 120,000 fans and Formula One racing authorities alike and striking a blow to the Michelin brand name. One month later, after a particularly poor showing in a race, the top driver using Bridgestone tires, famed German racer Michael Schumacher, delivered what may be the worst-ever plug for a sponsor: "It's obvious we have to get faster, but our main problem is the lack of grip with the tires. It was like trying to fight with a blunted weapon." To cap it off, racing authorities began openly questioning whether the corporate duel is doing the sport more harm than good.

Edouard Michelin, Michelin's chief executive, expresses faith nevertheless in the value of the effort. "Part of the adrenaline driving the company comes from the desire to win" in Formula One, he says.

Some marketing executives agree with the strategy. "Formula One is expensive but it's as close to global sponsorship as you can get," says Stephen Martin, chief executive of M&C Saatchi Sponsorship in London. It offers a way for Michelin and Bridgestone "to make tires exciting" to consumers around the world, he says.

Down on the tire lots, some retailers don't see it that way. Yoshio Midorikawa, a manager at Tire Shop Bear in Yokohama, Japan, says he can't imagine any of his Japanese customers buying a tire because its maker won a Formula One race. "Formula One racing goes on way above the clouds, and doesn't belong to us down here on earth," he says.


Jack Trout, president of marketing strategy firm Trout & Partners Ltd. in Old Greenwich, Conn., says the money spent by Michelin and Bridgestone is "staggering." He compares their competition to an arms race. "I suspect many companies feel deep down they are wasting their money," he says, "but that if they get out their competitors will take over."


Michelin currently has 20.1% of the global tire market, followed closely by Bridgestone, with 18.4%. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., based in Akron, Ohio, ranks No. 3 with 16.9%. Goodyear supplies tires to America's most popular racing circuit, Nascar, but withdrew from Formula One in 1998 citing escalating costs and rule changes.

High-performance tires for cars driven by ordinary folk account for a rising share of profits at both Michelin and Bridgestone. Both companies say research and development connected to Formula One leads to breakthroughs on performance and safety of mass-market tires. Bridgestone says it has updated its high-performance Potenza tires repeatedly with R&D secrets developed for the race track. Michelin says its Pilot Exalto and Pilot Sport premium tires also draw heavily on breakthroughs made in Formula One.

Technological Prowess

Formula One racing is the best opportunity to showcase technological prowess, the two companies argue. American racing enthusiasts prefer Nascar stock-car events, which involve more conventional-looking cars roaring around a track. But fans in Europe, Asia and Latin America care only about Formula One. Each season, some 500 million television viewers watch the sleek, winged Formula One racecars whip though curvy circuits from Shanghai to Monte Carlo, sometimes on city streets. It is one of the most widely watched sports in the world.

Hiroshi Yasukawa, Bridgestone's head of motorsport, calls Formula One its most powerful marketing tool. He credits it with boosting European awareness of the Bridgestone brand to 39% of those surveyed in 2004 from 13% in 1996. Bridgestone's European sales have risen 45% between 1999 and 2004.

Michelin, which is already strong in Western Europe and North America, hopes the racing exposure can help it grow in Asia, Eastern Europe and Latin America. In a company survey this year of five European countries and Russia, 46% of respondents said Formula One made them want to buy Michelin tires. In France and Russia, more than 60% said so. Overall, 82% said Michelin's participation improved the performance and reliability of its regular tires. Michelin says Formula One also helps it win other business from the European car makers whose racing teams it equips.

In Formula One racing, tires matter a lot. Over the past five years, advances in tire technology are estimated to have shaved up to six seconds from lap times of between 80 and 90 seconds. Robert Bell, technical director of the Renault team, estimates that tires alone accounted for 50% of the performance difference between the Renault and Ferrari teams this year. That places enormous pressure on Bridgestone and Michelin to keep getting faster.

Bridgestone was founded in 1931 by Shojiro Ishibashi, whose small family business made rubber-soled shoes. When he shifted into tires, Mr. Ishibashi used the English translation of his name, "Stone-Bridge," reversing it to create "Bridgestone." Long dominant in the Japanese market, Bridgestone captured American market share by buying the Firestone brand. But it struggled to make its name known in Europe. In 1998, it decided to use Formula One to try to change that.

Michelin came to racing early on. It started up in 1889 in the small town of Clermont-Ferrand in central France. Two brothers, Edouard and André Michelin, converted a struggling family factory that made farm machinery and rubber balls into a tire manufacturer, producing the first pneumatic tires for cars.

The brothers used one of the world's first motor competitions, the 1895 Paris-Bordeaux-Paris race, to promote the new tires. Although they were last among finishers, the brothers weren't among the race's many dropouts, proving their air-filled tires could run on roads.

Michelin entered Formula One in 1977, introducing belted radial racing tires that improved grip and speed. When the European economy softened in 1984 and Michelin's profits suffered, it pulled out. Edouard Michelin, the great-grandson of one founding brother and a lover of fast cars, took over in 1999. With the company's finances improved, he got back in.

The roughly $100 million that Bridgestone spends annually on Formula One includes trackside advertising and paying an undisclosed portion of the estimated $300 million it costs per year to keep the Ferrari team on the track. Michelin provides free tires to some teams, but doesn't offer other financial support. Three of the seven teams riding on Michelins, in fact, pay between about $3,600 and $6,000 for each set of four race tires. Although the tire deals differ by team, each one gives the tire sponsor a platform to claim some credit if a team wins.

The Right Balance

It can take up to a year to design and produce a new race tire, which is a far different product than any tire seen on the highway. Designers are constantly searching for the right balance between durability and speed. Race tires must withstand tread temperatures in excess of 200 degrees Fahrenheit, but must be soft enough to grip the winding courses, which is essential for speed. They need to last for only one race weekend. To further complicate matters, different tracks warrant different tires.

Until this year, Bridgestone dominated, carrying Mr. Schumacher, who drives for Scuderia Ferrari Marlboro, the Ferrari team, to five championships in a row. But during the past two years, Michelin developed innovative blends of materials that resulted in faster tires in the vital qualifying lap, according to team managers. That enabled the company to poach several of the top teams that used Bridgestones, such as B.A.R-Honda.

But the quest for speedier tires was driving up costs for racers because they necessitated more testing on the track. Keen to check escalating speeds and control team expenses, the Federation Internationale de L'Automobile, the sport's Paris-based regulatory body, instituted new rules this season. Teams could no longer change tires between qualifying laps and race day, or even during races, except to replace damaged ones. Now, tires have to last not 50 miles, but 300.

Michelin adapted well to the change. The Renault and McLaren-Mercedes teams it equipped took turns winning this season's first eight races, while Mr. Schumacher's Bridgestone-equipped Ferrari struggled. Jean Todt, Ferrari's head of motorsport, says the new rules "damaged those who were competitive before."

Bridgestone's engineers struggled to strike a better balance between speed and durability. At first, the tires were durable enough, but too slow in the qualifying lap. The engineers changed the tires to improve the qualifying performance, but that created durability problems.

In June, during a practice run at the U.S. Grand Prix in Indianapolis, Mr. Schumacher's younger brother Ralf, who races with the Toyota team, was rounding the track's final bend when his left rear Michelin abruptly went flat. His car careened into the wall at 180 mph.

Michelin hastily tested the other tires it had brought for the seven teams it equips. It concluded it couldn't vouch for their safety. All seven teams pulled out of the race, leaving the track wide open for the three Bridgestone-equipped teams. Many of the 120,000 fans were furious. Michael Schumacher won his first and only race of the season.

An angry FIA accused Michelin of taking excessive risks to win races. "It's a disastrous performance," said Max Mosley, the FIA's head, at a news conference in Paris shortly after. "Michelin failed to take the most basic precautions."

Mr. Michelin denies sacrificing safety for speed and says that Mr. Mosley was an "aggravating factor" in the Indianapolis crisis instead of "part of the solution." He maintains that his company simply miscalculated the demands of the Indianapolis track's final banked turn. "It was like having basketball shoes for a tennis game," he says. To quell criticism, Michelin agreed to pay fans who attended the race $14.6 million, in the form of cash refunds and future tickets. A spokesman for Bridgestone declined to comment on Michelin's mishap.

Bridgestone hoped to profit from Michelin's blunder by playing up its safety record, according to a person familiar with the matter. But the French company quickly returned to its winning ways.

At Germany's Hockenheim Grand Prix in July, the talk in the pit was all about tires. Mr. Schumacher, who is sometimes described as the best driver of all time, faded late in the race as his Bridgestone tires lost grip. He finished fifth with nearly bald rear tires.

"I don't think I can count myself in this battle anymore," a weary Mr. Schumacher told journalists after the race, blaming his tires.

When the Formula One season ended in mid-October, Mr. Schumacher had lost his driving title. Renault's Fernando Alonso, who drives on Michelins, became Formula One's youngest world champion. Renault also won the team championship, beating out McLaren-Mercedes, which came in second, and Ferrari which finished third.

It appears that for now, Mr. Schumacher's Ferrari team is stuck with its Bridgestones. Although neither Bridgestone nor Michelin disclose the length of their contracts with teams they equip, both companies say they extend for at least a year.

Ferrari's Mr. Todt denies the team wants to switch. Bridgestone's Mr. Yasukawa says the contract binding Ferrari to Bridgestone is "long enough." In mid-September, Bridgestone scored a surprising coup by poaching for next season one of the teams currently supplied by Michelin. Toyota, another team using Michelins, says it's also considering switching.

The FIA's Mr. Mosley and some team managers are now pressing to end the competition between Bridgestone and Michelin by designating a single tire supplier in Formula One. That would stop racing speeds from continuing to rise, thereby improving safety, and cut tire testing costs for all teams, they argue. Peter Sauber, who recently announced the sale of his Sauber-Petronas team to BMW, says having one supplier would reduce his team's costs by $10 million a year.

Michelin says the proposal is contrary to the spirit of racing, and has threatened to leave Formula One if it is adopted. If it cannot compete against another tire manufacturer, Michelin says, it cannot showcase its technology. Bridgestone says it also prefers the competition, but that it would like to remain involved in the sport no matter what.

Renault team manager Flavio Briatore says he is undecided about whether there should be one or two suppliers. But he agrees with other managers who say tires have become too important to the outcome of races. Formula One, he says, has at times "become a tire championship rather than a drivers' championship."

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB113036202331780412.html

Land Owners Sit Tight as Prices Go Over The Top

Gurbir Singh/ Mumbai

INDIA Bulls promoter Samir Gehlaut, who recently bid successfully for 2 NTC mills in Mumbai — Jupiter and Elphinstone —
has negotiated the purchase of a 4-bedroom, 3,000 sq ft apartment in Maker Tower ‘B’ in Mumbai’s posh Cuffe Parade locality
for a record-breaking Rs 33,000 a sq foot. That’s an expensive Rs 10-crore buy! The last bigprice deal in Maker Towers was
when Vinay Maloo of Himachal Futuristic paid Rs 30,000 a sq foot. Everybody thought he had gone over the top.
Brokers in south Mumbai say the value of residential stock in Cuffe Parade has shot up 40% over the last six months, while
that at Nariman Point is up 25% with vacancies coming down to negligible levels. “Cuffe Parade apartments that were quoting at
Rs 2 crore six months ago are at Rs 2.8 crore. In Colaba, prices have appreciated 30% with buildings like ‘Sagar Sangeet’ and
‘Harbour Heights’ quoting at Rs 10,000 and Rs 15,000 per sq foot, respectively,” a south-Mumbai broker Prakash Kanuga told
ET.
The spin-off of the current realty price spiral is that land-owners have been the biggest beneficiaries, walking away from
nearclosed deals to negotiate an even higher price.
Sample this: The 25-acre Mukand Iron’s foundry at Kurla has been in the market for some time with a slew of bidders, all
quoting over Rs 200 crore. The company almost inked a deal with Kalpataru Overseas Constructions for Rs 218 crore in June
this year, but walked away demanding a higher price. This month, Mukand was again on the point of selling the land to the
Neelkanth Group for a little over Rs 220 crore, but backed out at the last minute.
Commercial and office space broker Chetan Suchak too has a similar story. A big media group, keen to buy a building in the
Fort area, fixed an inspection of the property after initial talks. But the property owner failed to turn up and sent a message that
he wasn’t interested in selling.
In another deal, Mr Suchak negotiated the purchase of 70,000 sq ft of TDR at Rs 1,200 a sq foot from a TDR dealer, Natwar
Parikh. The deal did not happen as Mr Parikh thought it prudent to wait. “Property owners have adopted a wait-and-watch
attitude hoping prices will keep going up,” Mr Suchak told ET.
Among the metros, capital values of property have risen the fastest in Mumbai, averaging 25% over the last year. But more
than the metros, cities like Hyderabad and Kochi have seen a faster price spiral. According to a survey by Knight Frank Property
Consultants, capital values in ‘A’ grade residential areas in Kochi are up by 36% over June ’04. In Kochi, the highest rise was in
Diwan’s Road (Rs 1,600 per sq foot — up 71%), SRM Road (Rs 1,800 per sq foot — up 57%) and Tripunnithura (Rs1,500 per sq
foot — up 58%). Hyderabad averaged a rise of 23% over June ’04 prices. The highest was in Hyderguda (Rs 2,500 per sq foot —
up 47%), Narayanguda (Rs 2,100 per sq foot — up 40% and Secundrabad HO (Rs 2,700 per sq foot — up 42%).
This long-drawn spiral in property prices may be attributed to a variety of factors. The bullish sentiment in the economy, a
sudden spurt in purchasing power at the upper end of salary earners, combined with easy and cheap home loans have fuelled
demand. Stock market gains are being parked in the property market as well. Moreover, investors, earlier not visible in the
property market, have come back with a vengeance, driving up prices, particularly of new projects. The astounding rise in prices
in areas like Noida and Gurgaon are particularly ascribed to this tribe — they are cornering large residential and commercial
areas.
In Mumbai, the high prices are due to a few unnatural factors. For instance, a PIL to end TDR as an instrument in the building
industry has caused a run for this development paper pushing prices over the brink. Within a year, TDR prices have risen from
Rs 600 per sq foot to Rs 1,200 a sq foot. This, in turn, has skewed the pricing formula of developers.
“My Excel project in Andheri Oshiwara has a booking price of Rs 4,200 a sq foot. It included Rs 1,700 per sq foot for
construction and TDR costs, Rs 1,500 as land costs and Rs 1,000 per sq foot as profit. But with TDR prices touching Rs 1,400
-1,600 a sq foot, I may land up making a loss of Rs 200 a sq foot if I don’t revise my booking price,” says Vikas Oberoi of Oberoi
Constructions.
In Mumbai, there is a contrarian view that too much hoopla being made of the price rise and the impact of the mill land
judgement on prices. “Prices have begun to plateau out in the western suburbs, from Goregaon to Borivali, and are currently just
10% above the peak in 1995,” says a developer and industry watcher Ashok Goyal. He, however, acknowledged that in Mira
Road, a distant suburb of Mumbai, prices have shot up 40% after piped water connections were made available last year. In
Goregaon’s Oberoi Greens project, bookings opened six months ago at Rs 3,400 per sq foot. Today, bookings are at Rs 4,000 a
sq foot— an appreciation of 20% in just 6 months.

Toyota and Infy say Bangalore.out

Eyes other states for 2nd plant
 
By Byas Anand/TNN

Tokyo: You saw the infrastructure woes. Now see this: Karnataka’s showpiece auto investor, Toyota, is seriously thinking beyond Bangalore for its second plant for the small-car project. If Toyota walks out, Karnataka will lose a whopping investment of Rs 800 crore and the multiplier effect in the local economy.
   “The infrastructure in the state has not developed the way we had expected it to. We have expressed our concern to the state government,’’ Toyota executives said.
   The carmaker is in talks with several states to work out the sops and other modalities for this second plant. “We are very close to finalising our decision. Though we do have the option of expanding the current facility in Bidadi (near Bangalore) to set up the small car production lines, we are also actively looking at setting up a new venture altogether in a different state,” Toyota Motor Corp officials involved with the India project told The Times of India.
   Toyota Motor Corp president Katsuaki Watanabe, when contacted, said the new project — which will mark Toyota’s third model roll-out in India — is still under development and a decision on the matter will be taken shortly. The firm will be involving its compact car making arm Daihatsu in the new venture. “The equity sharing details are yet to be worked out and we are planning to use one of the existing platform from our stables to develop this new model specially for India,” an official said.
   “I cannot fix a timeframe on the third model project but this venture will surely mark our entry into the volume car business in India,” Watanabe said.
   (The correspondent was in Tokyo at the invitation of Toyota)
 
Andhra opens door for Infy
 
By K V Ramana/TNN
Hyderabad: With the row between N R Narayana Murthy and Deve Gowda escalating, the Andhra government has moved into top gear to woo Infosys to Hyderabad. The IT major already has a campus in Hyderabad’s hi-tech district Cyberabad, but the Y S Rajasekhara Reddy government is offering it land for a second. “Hyderabad is willing to host a larger Infosys facility,’’ a senior AP government official said.
   IT minister Sabita Indra Reddy said an Infosys team has already met Rajasekhara Reddy and sought about 100 acres of land. “We have agreed,” the minister confirmed. An announcement is expected within “ten days,” sources said.
   This possibility comes barely two days after Wipro signed a deal with the AP government to set up its second software development centre in Hyderabad “within 12 months”. Wipro has been allotted 100 acres of land at below-market prices.
   An AP government team is likely to be active in Bangalore’s annual four-day IT event, BangaloreIT.in, this week to win Infosys and other companies fed up with the collapsing infrastructure in the Garden City. “We (AP) are hosting a dinner at the BangaloreIT.in on October 26. We will definitely have something to celebrate after that,” a senior official confided.
   The land will be offered to Infosys at Maheswaram in the new 2,500-acre IT park-cum-special economic zone proposed near the being-built Shamshabad airport. In fact, Infosys would be offered ‘an anchor client’ status around which the IT ecosystem would be developed in the Shamshabad park.

Two global biggies log out of Bangalore City

Intel abandons Whitefield
 
By Sujit John/TNN
Bangalore: India’s ambitions of emerging a global chip design and development hub has just suffered a big knock. Intel has killed its muchhyped Whitefield chip, a multicrore Xeon processor for servers with four or more processors that drew its name from Bangalore’s IT hotspot, Whitefield, and which was being developed almost wholly in this city.
   Sources in Intel say the enterprise server platform, code-named New Town, also under development in India and which was to use the Whitefield processor, has perhaps been canned too “since no work on this has happened for over a month”.
   Intel had invested heavily in the project, both in infrastructure and people, drawing in some of the brightest talents. Some 600 people are said to be employed in the core hardware part of the project.
   Intel said the Whitefield chip is being replaced by a new processor code-named Tigerton, under development in Israel. A part of the Whitefield team is expected to be used for testing and validation of certain server platforms. An Intel spokesperson said there will be no downsizing. “We will only be ramping up in India. There are always new projects emerging that people can be redeployed into,” she said.
 
Bank moves 1,000 jobs to UK
 
By Mini Joseph Tejaswi/TNN
Bangalore: A big BPO account is being moved out of IT City. UKbased Abbey National, a financial institution that has been outsourcing to India through Bangalore-based M-Source, is moving the job back to its captive call centres in Milton Keynes, Teesside and Glasgow. M-Source has over 100 dedicated seats for the client, sources said.
When contacted, MphasiS chairman, Jerry Rao said: “No comments.’’
   However, according to a report in a section of the international media, the bank is bringing 1,000 jobs back to Britain. It also said that: “Abbey’s retreat from India was prompted by complaints from customers.’’
   The unit in Bangalore carries out basic bank accounting tasks, such as reading out customers’ balances over the phone and drawing up standing orders, said the article. However, customers were unhappy with the service; some even complained of language difficulties.
   An Abbey insider was quoted in the report as saying: “Given the risk to our reputation of moving the jobs offshore, you want the service to be top-notch. If it isn’t top-notch, then why are you there?’’

Devastating Exodus of Doctors From Africa and Caribbean Is Found

A new study documents for the first time the devastating exodus of doctors from Africa and the Caribbean to four wealthy English-speaking nations, the United States, Britain, Canada and Australia, which now depend on international medical graduates for a quarter of their physicians.
 
The findings are being published today in The New England Journal of Medicine. The study is likely to fuel an already furious debate about the role the developed world is playing in weakening African public health systems that have already been hit with pandemics that have shortened life expectancies in some countries.
 
Dr. Agyeman Akosa, the director general of Ghana's health service, said in a phone interview from Geneva, where he is attending a World Health Organization forum on the global medical staffing crisis, that his country's public health system was virtually collapsing because it was losing not just many of its doctors, but its best ones.
 
Skip to next paragraph
 The New England Journal of Medicine Report: "The Metrics of the Physician Brain Drain" "I have at least nine hospitals that have no doctor at all, and 20 hospitals with only one doctor looking after a whole district of 80,000 to 120,000 people," Dr. Akosa said. Women in obstructed labor all too often suffer terrible complications or death for lack of an obstetrician, he said.
 
The biggest losers are the small to medium-size countries of Africa and the Caribbean. Dr. Mullan's research found that Jamaica, for example, has lost 41 percent of its doctors and Haiti 35 percent, while Ghana has lost 30 percent and South Africa, Ethiopia and Uganda 14 to 19 percent.
 
 
This brain drain is occuring not only in the Carribean but also in the Philippines